Professor Alan Rozenshtein was recently quoted by AP News, New Yorker, CNN, & The Dispatch on the trial for five members of the Oath Keepers, who are being tried for seditious conspiracy for their involvement in the January 6th Capitol insurrection. Professor Rozenshtein defined seditious conspiracy as "acting for the purpose of preventing the government from enforcing the law as a government." While the charge is seditious conspiracy is very rare, that doesn't necessarily mean it's difficult to prove.

Professor Linus Chan was recently interviewed on Detroit Today about the recent trend of republican governors of border-states shipping migrants out of their state, sending them across the nation, frequently to non-border states with democrat governors. Weighing in on the topic, Professor Chan stated, “The Articles of Confederation had specific language that allowed the free movement of, not just citizens, but habitants between the states."

A Reuters article titled Why Amazon may have the upper hand in antitrust suits discusses recent antitrust actions in Washington, D.C., California, and Seattle targeting pricing policies used by Amazon, which critics contend has the effect of discouraging merchants from lowering the prices they charge on other websites.  The article quotes Professor Tom Cotter, who states that an issue in these cases is "whether Amazon's commitment to offering the lowest prices 'helps or harms consumers,'” and that “In general, it's very difficult for plaintiffs to win on these types of claims.”

Professor Alan Rozenshtein was recently quoted by the Washington Post on the U.S. Court of Appeals recent upholding of a Texas law that bars social-media companies from removing posts based on political ideology. The decision comes in the wake of a relentless back and forth between calls for social media companies to both curb misinformation and harmful content, and to not censor political expression.